Resumen

FLORES-MARTINEZ, Alejandra  y  URIBE-ARZATE, Enrique. OVERCOMING PROTECTIONIST MONOPOLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE MEXICAN CONSTITUTIONAL STATE, AFTER THE AMENDMENT TO THE FIRST ARTICLE OF THE CONSTITUTION. Vniversitas [online]. 2014, n.129, pp.103-134. ISSN 0041-9060.  https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.VJ129.smpd.

This paper studies the incidence of the Constitution and international treaties for the effective protection of human rights in Mexico, after the constitutional reform of June 10th 2011 and the paradigmatic sentence of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation within the file varios ('various') 912/2010. With these changes, international criteria become an interpretive parameter that end the sole and final interpretation of human rights. Based on an epistemological approach, the Mexican constitutional openness to the international protection of human rights builds an external control and a double guarantee for such rights, which extends beyond reductionist or unilateral criteria from the exclusive will of the State; that is to say, there is a reciprocal dialogue between domestic and international judicial bodies that seeks to overcome the protectionist monopoly in relation to human rights in Mexico.

Palabras clave : Human rights; jurisprudential dialogue; constitutional interpretation; reciprocity rules; interpretive monopoly.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )