SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.65 número2Los adolescentes con conductas de riesgo muestran respuesta psicofisiológica alteradaPercepción de calidad de sueño en jóvenes universitarios y relaciones románticas: estudio de corte transversal índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina

versión impresa ISSN 0120-0011

Resumen

GONZALEZ-VARGAS, Sandra; CORTES-REYES, Edgar  y  MARINO-ISAZA, Felipe. Validation of the instrument to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries in racing skaters in Villavicencio. rev.fac.med. [online]. 2017, vol.65, n.2, pp.189-196. ISSN 0120-0011.  https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v65n2.59379.

Introduction:

The physical condition of skaters and its correlation with musculoskeletal injuries in a city with a high level of sports practice are unknown.

Objective:

To validate an instrument to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries in racing skaters in Villavicencio.

Materials and methods:

The instrument includes five domains qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by experts using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for reliability analysis. Validity was analyzed based on the psychometric properties of the questions, that is, question-test correlation, question discrimination, difficulty level, and non-response indexes.

Results:

In qualitative terms, a high level of agreement between expert evaluations was found using Kendall's W (ordinal variables) at 95% confidence, as well as a high inter- and intra-evaluator agreement in the reliability of the questionnaire. A p value greater than 0.05 was quantitatively observed for consistency between items. Internal consistency was >0.6 with good biserial correlation in 50% of the questions. 96.9% approved the difficulty criteria, 87.5% were differentiated between high and very high, and 93.8% were not suitable or acceptable responses.

Conclusions:

The reproducibility of the instrument was high. Regarding validity, the final test showed optimal psychometric properties that can be usedl in the analysis of results.

Palabras clave : Validation Studies; Questionnaires; Musculoskeletal System; Prevalence (MeSH).

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )