SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 issue128THE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE PROBLEM OF ITS JUSTIFICATION WITHIN THE ARGUMENT BETWEEN BOYLE AND SPINOZA author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Ideas y Valores

Print version ISSN 0120-0062

Abstract

RIVERA DE ROSALES, Jacinto. KANT AND HANNAH ARENDT. Ideas y Valores [online]. 2005, vol.54, n.128, pp.3-31. ISSN 0120-0062.

This article introduces a critical commentary to Hannah Arendt’s interpretation of Kant in her Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. The author follows the scheme of what Arendt considers the three Kantian human perspectives: man as a rational being, man as an animal species, and man as a synthesis of the rational and the sensitive. Arendt’s research focuses on the contribution that the Kantian theory of the reflexive judgment can bring to a political theory, following the distinction between actor and spectator.

Keywords : Hannah Arendt; Kant; reflexive judgment; Critique of judgment.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License