SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 issue128KANT AND HANNAH ARENDTAGRIPA’S PROBLEM author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Ideas y Valores

Print version ISSN 0120-0062

Abstract

CARDENAS, José Luis. THE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE PROBLEM OF ITS JUSTIFICATION WITHIN THE ARGUMENT BETWEEN BOYLE AND SPINOZA. Ideas y Valores [online]. 2005, vol.54, n.128, pp.33-60. ISSN 0120-0062.

The purpose of this article is to show the conflict that has to do with epistemic and methodological issues involved in Boyle/Spinoza discussion, which allows to appreciate how it should be reassessed, at least two things, in the growing natural science of the Seventeenth Century: i) the preference of a hypothetical and practical knowledge instead of the mere pretence of an absolute certainty of the scientific knowledge. And ii) the investigation of the nature demands a careful experimentation that stresses the development of some epistemological approaches and different method to those to which most modern philosophers were accustomed to.

Keywords : Boyle; Spinoza; Seventeenth Century; theory of knowledge; methodology; experimental philosophy; method.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License