Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
Ideas y Valores
versión impresa ISSN 0120-0062
Resumen
BORDONABA PLOU, DAVID. FAULTLESS DISAGREEMENT AND RECANTATION A DEFENSE OF RELATIVISM REGARDING JUDGMENTS OF TASTE. Ideas y Valores [online]. 2019, vol.68, n.170, pp.205-228. ISSN 0120-0062. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v68n170.62774.
The objective of the article is, first of all, to analyze faultless disagreement as a central element in judgments of taste and to examine three positions: deictic contextualism, non-deictic contextualism, and relativism. Secondly, it shows how deictic contextualism and relativism account for that phenomenon and argues that only the latter can do so and at the same time accommodate a central feature of those disagreements: recantation.
Palabras clave : deictic contextualism; non-deictic contextualism; faultless disagreement; relativ-ism; recantation.