SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 número3The Flynn effect in Brazil: Examining generational changes in the Draw-a-Person and in the Raven's Coloured Progressive MatricesExecutive function and use of semantic strategies in children índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

versão impressa ISSN 0120-0534

Resumo

MINERVINO, Ricardo A; MARTIN, Alejandra  e  TRENCH, Juan Máximo. Comprehending a metaphor does not require sensory-motor simulations of the base domain. rev.latinoam.psicol. [online]. 2012, vol.44, n.3, pp.23-34. ISSN 0120-0534.

There is evidence for the idea that people employ conceptual metaphors (CMs) to interpret metaphorical expressions (MEs), although the available data regarding the thesis that comprehending MEs requires sensory-motor simulations of the base domains of such CMs is scarce and ambiguous. An experiment was carried out to determine whether such sensory-motor simulations are necessary or at least enrich the comprehension of MEs. Sighted and congenitally blind subjects paraphrased novel MEs derived from the seeing-understanding CM. The congenitally blind showed very good comprehension of these MEs, and their performance on this task was not inferior compared to the sighted. It is concluded that sensory-motor simulations are not necessary nor do they enrich the comprehension of MEs, and that amodal CMs are enough for this task. Implications of the obtained results for the embodied view of Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory are discussed.

Palavras-chave : Metaphor; conceptual metaphor; embodied cognition.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )