SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 número3Weight change in women with breast cancer (IIIB) after treatmentSerum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and their relationship to metabolic syndrome in a population of young nondiabetic men índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Acta Medica Colombiana

versão impressa ISSN 0120-2448

Resumo

VALLEJO-GONZALEZ, Santiago et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with fragility fractures: Are we doing things right?. Acta Med Colomb [online]. 2020, vol.45, n.3, pp.16-21.  Epub 02-Jun-2021. ISSN 0120-2448.  https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2020.1319.

Introduction:

Osteoporosis is a disease which increases as our population ages. It is associated with a greater risk of fragility fractures, leading to a loss of independence, chronic pain and even death. In order to avoid these complications, it is important to describe the population diagnosed with fragility fractures and determine if patients at risk for or diagnosed with osteoporosis are being screened and managed appropriately.

Materials and methods:

A prospective study of patients hospitalized due to fragility fractures in a tertiary care hospital from March-September 2018. The patients were described according to clinical and sociodemographic variables, and screening criteria from various guidelines were applied to determine if patients with fragility fractures are being adequately screened and managed.

Results:

Seventy patients with fragility fractures were identified, with an average age of 80.01 ± 10.73 years. Of these, 81.43% had been seen by a general practitioner, but only 50% had been educated on fall prevention. In addition, 97.14%, 95.71% and 90.0% of these patients met the osteoporosis screening criteria according to the NOF, ISCD and OSC guidelines, respectively, and only 11.43% had been screened.

Conclusion:

Fragility fractures are common in our setting. However, turnaround times for care and intervention are long and both primary and secondary prevention efforts are currently insufficient.(Acta Med Colomb 2020; 45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2020.1319).

Palavras-chave : density; Densitometry; Osteoporotic fractures; Osteoporosis; Primary Prevention; Secondary Prevention.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês | Espanhol     · Inglês ( pdf ) | Espanhol ( pdf )