SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 issue2Assessment of non-cardiac surgical patients using the ACS-NSQIP calculator to predict the risk of pneumonia, cardiac complications and venous thromboembolism author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Acta Medica Colombiana

Print version ISSN 0120-2448

Abstract

LOZANO-MARTINEZ, JANER NELSON; OTERO-REGINO, WILLIAM ALBERTO  and  MARULANDA-FERNANDEZ, HERNANDO. Impact of treatment optimization in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who do not respond to esomeprazole. Acta Med Colomb [online]. 2021, vol.46, n.2, pp.1-6.  Epub Nov 16, 2021. ISSN 0120-2448.  https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2021.2041.

Introduction:

gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects one out of eight people in Colombia. Its characteristic symptoms are heartburn and reflux. The cornerstone of treatment is proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), with a clinical response in 58-80% of patients. Of those who do not respond, 75-90% have a superimposed functional disorder and could be treated by adding visceral neuromodulators.

Objective:

to evaluate the impact of optimizing the treatment of patients with GERD when there is no response to esomeprazole (ESO).

Materials and methods:

a prospective study in patients with no clinical response (more than two reflux episodes per week) who were treated with 40 mg of ESO half an hour before breakfast along with the recommendation to lose weight if BMI >25, stop smoking and manage stress; and, finally, increasing the ESO dose to 40 mg on an empty stomach and before dinner. When all of this was done and symptoms persisted, 12.5 mg of amitriptyline were added at night. The response was evaluated every 12 weeks.

Results:

a total of 529 patients were eligible and 149 met the inclusion criteria. With treatment optimization, 111 patients had a clinical response without using amitriptyline (74.5%; 95%CI 67.2 81.4). Amitriptyline was added in 22 patients (14.8%), 15 of whom responded (68.2%; 95%CI 47.04-89.32%). Eight patients experienced drowsiness (53.3%). A relationship was found between PPI treatment compliance and clinical response (p<0.0001).

Conclusions:

in patients with GERD, PPI treatment optimization improves 74.5% (95%CI 67.2 81.4) of the patients, and adding amitriptyline for those who do not improve achieves improvement in 68.2% of those who did not improve with two doses of ESO. Sequential management achieved a cumulative improvement in symptom control in 85% (95%CI 78.6-90.4) of the patients. (Acta Med Colomb 2021; 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2021.2041).

Keywords : treatment optimization; PPI; compliance; clinical response; neuromodulator.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )