SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 número2ACTIVIDAD REPRODUCTIVA DESPUÉS DEL ANESTRO INDUCIDO CON ALTRENOGEST EN HEMBRAS DE Tursiops truncatus EN CAUTIVERIO EN AMBIENTE MARINO índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia

versión impresa ISSN 0120-2952

Resumen

OSORIO, J. H  y  VINASCO, J. DETERMINATION OF LDL CHOLESTEROL LEVELS OF COMPARING THE PRECIPITATE METHOD VS THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA CANINE. Rev. Med. Vet. Zoot. [online]. 2015, vol.62, n.2, pp.10-15. ISSN 0120-2952.  https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v62n2.51986.

The objetive of this study was to compare the precipitation method with the method of Friedewald formula for the determination ofLDL cholesterol in dogs. For that, blood samples of 185 overnight fasted adult dogs of different breed and sex were obtained. Blood levels of LDL cholesterol were determined by the precipitation method and later by the Friedewald method. The results were analyzed using one way ANOVA. The precipitate method reported values in mg/dl of: 52.40 average, 2.66 minimum, 132.67 maximum, 130.01 range and 24.29 of standard deviation. For its part, the Friedewald equation values in mg/dl were: 65.19 average, 4.55 minimum, 184.20 maximum, 179.65 range and 31.51 of standard deviation. The p-value in the F test was less than 0.05, indicating statistically significant difference between the two methods analyzed with a confidence level of 95.0%. In conclusion it can be used the precipitated method for determining LDL cholesterol levels in dogs.

Palabras clave : Dogs; LDL cholesterol; precipitate method; friedewald method.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )