SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 número2Polimorfismos del gen pfmdr1 en muestras clínicas de Plasmodium falciparum y su relación con la respuesta terapéutica a antipalúdicos y paludismo grave en ColombiaEvaluación de la prueba rápida inmunocromatográfica Binax NOW® ICT Pf/Pv para el diagnóstico del paludismo en un área endémica de Colombia índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Biomédica

versión impresa ISSN 0120-4157versión On-line ISSN 2590-7379

Resumen

ARISTIZABAL, Juan Carlos; RESTREPO, María Teresa  y  ESTRADA, Alejandro. Body composition assessment by anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance. Biomédica [online]. 2007, vol.27, n.2, pp.216-224. ISSN 0120-4157.

Introduction. Anthropometry and electric impedance methods are widely used for body composition assessment. However the evidence is unclear whether the results obtained from the two methods can be compared. Objective. Two methods are compared for assessment of body composition; anthropometry and electric impedance. Materials and methods. Body composition was measured in 70 women; aged 22 to 56 and 53 men; aged 24 to 54, using anthropometry (Durning/Womersley and Jackson/Pollock skinfolds equations) and electric impedance (foot to foot electric impedance) to obtain percentage body fat. Results. The mean percentage body fat was significant higher with Durning/Womersley (25.2%) than Jackson/Pollock (20.1%) and electric impedance (19.3%) for men (p<0.001). The mean percentage body fat was significant higher with Durning/Womersley (36.9%) than Jackson/Pollock (31.0%) and electric impedance (27.6%) for women (p<0.001). Correlation coefficient was high when two methods were compared (r>0.77) however, the concordance between methods to classify obesity subjects was low (K<0.5). Conclusions. The percentages obtained from the anthropometry method were higher than the bioelectrical impedance method. A significant difference was found between methods applied in men and women, and therefore these methods are not comparable.

Palabras clave : body composition; body mass index; electric impedance; adult.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons