SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 número1Evaluación del daño en el ADN y vigilancia biológica de la exposición laboral a solventes orgánicos, 2006Eficacia de la combinación amodiaquina más sulfadoxina-pirimetamina y de la cloroquina para el tratamiento del paludismo en Córdoba, Colombia, 2006 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Biomédica

versión impresa ISSN 0120-4157versión On-line ISSN 2590-7379

Resumen

ROMERO, Javier; SANABRIA, Álvaro; ANGARITA, Miguel  y  VARON, Juan Carlos. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Biomédica [online]. 2008, vol.28, n.1, pp.139-147. ISSN 0120-4157.

Introduction. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is difficult in nearly 30% of patients with pain in low right quadrant. Diagnostic imaging may provide a means of a more accurate diagnosis. Objective. The cost-effectiveness of diagnostic image tests was calculated for comparison with routine physical examination in patients with abdominal pain suspected to be appendicitis. Materials and methods.  A cost-effectiveness protocol was designed, using a decision analysis model. The standard case  was a patient with abdominal pain in right lower quadrant and suspicion of appendicitis. Three independent diagnostic alternatives were selected-ultrasonography, abdominal tomography and physical exam  in hospital with the subject under observation less than six hours. Operative characteristics, study design and costs of interventions and outcomes were assessed. The main outcome consisted of a confirmed diagnosis of appendicitis. The point of view taken was that of health maintenance organizations. Direct and indirect medical costs were measured. Time horizon used was three months. A one way sensitivity analysis was made. Results. For a prepaid system, the most cost-effective strategy was abdominal tomography, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of US$965/diagnosed patient. For public system, the most cost-effective strategy was abdominal tomography, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of US$492/diagnosed patient. Conclusions. Imaging diagnostic methods, in cases of abdominal pain suspected to be appendicitis, are more cost-effective than physical exam to make accurate diagnostic decisions. Tomography offers the best cost-effectiveness in prepaid system and in public health system.

Palabras clave : appendicitis [diagnosis]; cost-benefit analysis; tomography; ultrasonography; physical examination; decision support techniques.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons