SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número4Styrylquinolines-type synthetic compounds with leishmanicidal and cytotoxic activitiesDiscriminating concentrations for three insecticides used in public health in a Lutzomyia longipalpis experimental strain from Colombia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Biomédica

versão impressa ISSN 0120-4157

Resumo

PEREZ, Luis Alfonso; GONZALEZ, Diana Marcela; ALVAREZ, Karen Margarita de Jesús  e  DIAZ-MARTINEZ, Luis Alfonso. Nasal CPAP versus mechanical ventilation in 28 to 32-week preterm infants with early surfactant administration . Biomédica [online]. 2014, vol.34, n.4, pp.612-623. ISSN 0120-4157.  https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v34i4.2163.

Introduction: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is useful in low birth weight infants with respiratory distress, but it is not known if it is a better alternative to mechanical ventilation after early pulmonary surfactant administration. Objective: To compare the incidence of adverse events in 28 to 32-week newborns with respiratory distress managed with mechanical ventilation or CPAP after early surfactant administration. Materials and methods: In total, 176 newborns were treated with CPAP and 147 with mechanical ventilation, all with Apgar scores >3 at five minutes and without apnea. Results: The incidence of CPAP failure was 6.5% (95% CI: 11.3-22.8%); 29 patients died: 7 with CPAP (4.0%) and 22 with mechanical ventilation (15.0%, p<0.001). The relative risk of dying with CPAP versus mechanical ventilation was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.12-0.61), but after adjusting for confounding factors, CPAP use did not imply a higher risk of dying (RR=0.60; 95% CI: 0.29-1.24). Mechanical ventilation fatality rate was 5.70 (95% CI: 3.75-8.66) deaths/1,000 days-patient, while with CPAP it was 1.37 (95% CI: 0.65-2.88, p<0.001). Chronic lung disease incidence was lower with CPAP than with mechanical ventilation (RR=0.71; 95% CI: 0.54-0.96), as were intracranial hemorrhage (RR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.09-0.84) and sepsis (RR=0.67; 95%CI: 0.52-0.86), and it was similar for air leaks (RR=2.51; 95% CI: 0.83-7.61) and necrotizing enterocolitis (RR=1.68, 95% CI: 0.59-4.81). Conclusion: CPAP exposure of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome is protective against chronic lung disease, intraventricular hemorrhage and sepsis compared to mechanical ventilation. No differences were observed regarding air leak syndrome or death.

Palavras-chave : Respiratory distress syndrome, newborn; positive-pressure respiration; respiration, artificial; infant, premature; infant, very low birth weight; pulmonary surfactants.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )