SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue32Importance of Philosophical Problems in Hart's Legal PhilosophyÉTHOLOGIE PHILOSOPHIQUE: L'HOMMO COMPENSATOR ET SON DESTIN author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688On-line version ISSN 2389-9387

Abstract

COLOMINA ALMINANA, Juan José. Understanding Presupossition as Anaphora Some Problems on Kripke's Account. Prax. filos. [online]. 2011, n.32, pp.207-230. ISSN 0120-4688.

According to Kripke, the traditional approaches to presupposition do not work in some compound sentences because the presuppositions from their component clauses traditionally assign presuppositions to each clause in isolation. I agree with this criticism, but I think that a contextual requirement is sometimes needed in order to determinate the meaning of presupposition included in a complex sentence, and this view can solve some problems in Kripke's semantic approach.

Keywords : Presupposition; anaphora; meaning; truth-conditions; Contextualism; Literalism; Kripke.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License