SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue35Disputes of Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on logical necessityNeoracionalism and metaethics author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688

Abstract

MIRANDA ROJAS, Rafael. Future Contingents, Bivalence and Epistemic Indeterminism. Prax. filos. [online]. 2012, n.35, pp.59-82. ISSN 0120-4688.

The first aim of this paper is to show how Aristotle accepts the principle of excluded middle and bivalence in statements about future contingent. The main consequence of this, against the trivalent positions, is that statements about future contingent have no truth value indeterminate: are either true or false. Different indeterministic positions are analyzed in order to show how these depend on an implausible thesis: i) the application of the principle of excluded middle and bivalence in statements about future results in determinism. It is proposed that the indeterminism attributed to these statements is epistemic, not alethic: a subject S does not know at time t before t1 the truth value of statements about future contingent.

Keywords : Excluded Middle; Bivalence; Epistemic Indeterminism; Determinism; Indeterminate Truth Value.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )