SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue35Future Contingents, Bivalence and Epistemic IndeterminismThe principle of logical closure of knowledge and skepticism author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688

Abstract

ZAVADIVKER, Nicolás. Neoracionalism and metaethics. Prax. filos. [online]. 2012, n.35, pp.83-96. ISSN 0120-4688.

The aim of this article is to analyze, from a metaethical perspective, the neo-racionalist thesis according to which the moral judgments has pretensions of validity. This position considers that it is essential to the moral judgments pretends to be rationally acceptable, and that them aspire to an intersubjective validity that anyone, in ideal conditions, should recognize. In the present article there will be questioned the scope of this thesis, and will be rejected the idea according to which a judgment of value is always invoking our disposition to be judged for a universal and entirely rational audience.

Keywords : moral judgments; metaethics; neo-racionalism; pretensions of validity.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )