SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue38The role of the opinion of the predecessors in the Aristotelian conception of philosophy, especially in the early books of the MetaphysicsDeleuze as Plato's reader author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688

Abstract

ISLER SOTO, Carlos. Is nominalism necessarily connected to a voluntarist conception of Natural Law? Ockham's and Hobbes' case. Prax. filos. [online]. 2014, n.38, pp.175-200. ISSN 0120-4688.

Nominalism is normally associated with a voluntarist conception of Natural Law, mainly because of the association of both doctrines in the work of William of Ockham. However, there is no necessary connection between them and, to show that, we will expound Hobbes' doctrine on the subject. In this author, a philosophical nominalism more extreme than that of Ockham, is associated with a completely necessitarist conception of Natural Law. In this sense, it can be said that in Hobbes there is, on moral matters, an inversion of Ockham's doctrine. In both cases there is recourse to God, but in Ockham's case, to provide the content of Natural Law and, in Hobbes', to warrant its obligatory character

Keywords : Ockham; Hobbes; Nominalism; Natural Law; Divine Omnipotence; Psychological Egoism.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )