SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue41Models and representation in Bas Van Fraassen's empiricist structuralism author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688On-line version ISSN 2389-9387

Abstract

LOPEZ-ASTORGA, Miguel. The formal discipline theory and mental logic. Prax. filos. [online]. 2015, n.41, pp.11-25. ISSN 0120-4688.

The formal discipline theory claims that the study of mathematics develops individuals' logical skills. Attridge and Inglis carried out an experiment in order to check whether or not that theory holds. Their conclusion was that their results showed that, while mathematics can indeed improve logical abilities, it is necessary to assume the defective interpretation of conditional. However, López-Astorga countered that other interpretations of their results are possible, that they do not prove that the material interpretation of conditional is not valid, and that the mental models theory can also explain them. In this paper, I comment the problems linked to the other possible interpretations proposed by López-Astorga and try to argue that the best option in the interpretation of Attridge and Inglis' results is to assume the mental logic theory

Keywords : defective conditional; formal discipline theory; material conditional; mental logic; mental models.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )