SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número41Analogy (Paradeigma) as composed inference in Aristotle and PeirceThe marxian critique of the hegelian dialectic. From the ideal reproduction of an ideal process to the ideal reproduction of a real process índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Praxis Filosófica

versão impressa ISSN 0120-4688versão On-line ISSN 2389-9387

Resumo

CARDENAS BARRETO, José Luis. Conflicts of experimental philosophy in the seventeenth century. Prax. filos. [online]. 2015, n.41, pp.57-79. ISSN 0120-4688.

In this article I want to explore the idea that experimental philosophy developed in England in the 1660s was a proposal with two main objectives: i) to consolidate a new way of investigating nature that would permit understanding its diversity and complexity, through the use of experiments and the rejection of speculative hypotheses as the main strategies to develop, implement and defend; ii) it demanded from natural philosophers of the time a new attitude based on the expertise and caution when developing explanatory systems, which in many cases conflicted with the interests of the researchers themselves. This tension permits identifying some interesting differences between speculative natural philosophy of the seventeenth century and the emerging experimental philosophy, differences that are not always considered by scholars of early modern philosophy

Palavras-chave : natural philosophy; experiment; methodology; Bacon; Hooke.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )