SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue44Convergent ethics as a response to the unilateralism of individualization and universalization.Habermas’ Postmetaphysical Analysis of Religion author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688On-line version ISSN 2389-9387

Abstract

TOVAR BOHORQUEZ, José Oliverio. PRINZ’S CONSTITUTION MODEL OF MORAL JUDGMENT: A CRITICAL READING. Prax. filos. [online]. 2017, n.44, pp.107-118. ISSN 0120-4688.

The purpose of this paper is to critically review Prinz’s constitution model. According to commonly suggested models, moral judgment is the result of specific cognitive processes that are intuitive, emotional or rational. According to Prinz, sentimentalist views argue that such judgments are caused by emotions. In contrast, he argues that moral judgment is constituted, not caused, by them. I will expose Prinz’s argument to support his proposal and outline some inconsistencies of it.

Keywords : sentiment; emotion; moral judgment; constitution model.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )