SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número46The teaching of Adam Smith's philosophical project in the historiography of economic thoughtTwo conceptions of language: Wittgenstein and Chomsky on recursion as a “good” explanation of human nature índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Praxis Filosófica

versão impressa ISSN 0120-4688versão On-line ISSN 2389-9387

Resumo

INDAVERA STIEBEN, Leandro Gastón. THE EXPRESSION “INVISIBLE HAND” AS NON EXPLANATORY. Prax. filos. [online]. 2018, n.46, pp.111-123. ISSN 0120-4688.  https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i46.6153.

According to economists such as Arrow, Hahn and Tobin, for example, the expression “invisible hand” is the most important contribution made in the History of Economic Thought and is explanatory of economic processes (Arrow & Hahn, 1971:1 and Tobin, 1992:117). In this paper a set of arguments are proposed in order to contend that Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” expression is not relevant in explanatory terms. Firstly, Smith is reluctunt to accept that expressions related to invisible and intelligent agents can explain natural phenomena. In order to analyze this topic, a Humean reading of Smith is attempted, as well as an interpretation of Smith’s critic of Kepler and Descartes.

Palavras-chave : expression; hand invisible; no explain; Natural Phenomena; Belief; Knowledge.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )