SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 issue46THE EXPRESSION “INVISIBLE HAND” AS NON EXPLANATORYThe world in the Heidegger´s phenomenology. An approach to the world from the History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688
On-line version ISSN 2389-9387


MOTA, Sergio. Two conceptions of language: Wittgenstein and Chomsky on recursion as a “good” explanation of human nature. Prax. filos. [online]. 2018, n.46, pp.125-149. ISSN 0120-4688.

My major aim in this paper is to discuss whether the property of recursion provides a good explanation of human specificity. In so doing, I will analyze two approaches to the study of natural language: the computational and the anthropological conceptions. The main conclusion of this work is twofold. On the one hand, I argue that recursion is not a good explanation of human essence. On the other hand, what is, indeed, specifically human is the construction of a mythology with a metaphysical slant, in this particular case, in the guise of the language of science.

Keywords : Wittgenstein; Chomsky; Language; Recursion; Computational Conception; Anthropological Conception.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )