SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue46Philosophical cominciamento in Thomas Aquinas and Hegel according to Cornelio FabroMurdering, robbing and fornicating: moral absolutes in Aristotle author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688
On-line version ISSN 2389-9387

Abstract

GIBSON, Francisco García. Against Moral Purism. Prax. filos. [online]. 2018, n.46, pp.189-198. ISSN 0120-4688.  http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i46.6168.

Moral purism is the view that doing evil is never allowed, even as a means to prevent a greater evil. This article assesses two main versions of moral purism and shows that they are implausible. The first version claims that it is always impermissible to choose an option that results in a bad states of affairs, while the second version claims that it is always impermissible to choose an option that is wrong, even if it is only prima facie wrong. I contend that both versions are incomplete, in the sense that they are unable to provide practical guidance for cases in which all available options result in bad states of affairs, or in which all available options are prima facie wrong.

Keywords : purism; lesser evil; prima facie wrong; incompleteness; wrongness.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )