SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue47The emotional function of musical education in AristotleReading Marx after Preciado. Rethinking the “fragment on machines” from a transhumanist perspective author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688On-line version ISSN 2389-9387

Abstract

VELAZQUEZ, José Luis. The appropriation of phronesis (The debate between Gadamer and Tugendhat). Prax. filos. [online]. 2018, n.47, pp.157-167. ISSN 0120-4688.  https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i47.6618.

For Gadamer, the choosing of the concept phronesis has a goal: to unite hermeneutics with Aristotle’s ethics, and to present the problem of the application of moral knowledge as a model of hermeneutics problem. Considering E. Tugendhat’s critical contributions to the matter, in this paper there’ll be an analysis on some difficulties in Gadamer’s approach, which derive from phronesis’ impossibility to properly apply moral knowledge and to justify what is morally valid. Likewise, it will be shown how these difficulties affect comprehension on moral learning procedural structures and the self-reflecting process.

Keywords : phronesis; hermeneutics, ethics; knowledge; moral; learning.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )