SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue50The Value of the Moral Dilemmas for the Theory of Decision-Making author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688On-line version ISSN 2389-9387

Abstract

BASSOLS, Alejandro Tomasini. Lying, Deceiving and Misleading. Prax. filos. [online]. 2020, n.50, pp.207-226. ISSN 0120-4688.  https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i50.8839.

In this essay I deal with some of the concepts which constitutes a particular family, namely, the concepts of lying, deceiving and misleading. One of my goals is to carry out a conceptual analysis which would fit in the Wittgensteinian perspective on language. I argue that those concepts are hierarchically organized and that “deceive” is the most basic of all, since lying is something that only users of language can do and the phenomena of deceiving can be found in the animal kingdom. I try to establish certain grammatical truths like “one cannot lie without intending to deceive” or “it’s not possible to lie using only true propositions”. I suggest a light correction should be done to the traditional definition of ‘lying’ by replacing ‘believe’ by ‘know’. I also examine the notion of bald-face lie and I try to show that it’s a superfluous notion (not to say a spurious one). I critically examine the idea that lying is always an unacceptable action and I offer some examples to support my case. Finally, I briefly discuss the interesting question whether it is possible to mislead someone by means of truths and I show that although no lies are proffered it’s perfectly possible to mislead him.

Keywords : Lie; Behaviour; Mislead; Language; Truth.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )