SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número54¿Religión y ciencia sin creencia? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Praxis Filosófica

versión impresa ISSN 0120-4688versión On-line ISSN 2389-9387

Resumen

REINOSO, Guadalupe. Neopyrrhonism as Metaphilosophy: A Non-Quietist Proposal. Prax. filos. [online]. 2022, n.54, pp.11-30.  Epub 09-Mar-2022. ISSN 0120-4688.  https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i54.11935.

R. Fogelin (2002 [1976]; 1992 [1981]; 1994) was the first one to speak about “Neopyrrhonism” to link Wittgenstein and Sextus Empiricus. To him, Pyrrhonism “combines philosophical scepticism with scepticism about philosophy, that is, to have doubts about philosophy on the basis of philosophical arguments” (1994, p. 3). Following this interpretation, Neopyrrhonism can be understood as a kind of scepticism that cancels philosophy using self-destructive arguments (peritrope). Both Sextus -with his proposal of suspension of judgment- and Wittgenstein -with his idea of the dissolution of philosophical problems- are representatives of quietism. Neopyrrhonism as quietism can be conceived of as a therapeutic proposal mainly based on not postulating an argumentative-constructive philosophical theory. Against this perspective, I propose interpreting Neopyrrhonism as Metaphilosophy, from which a performative proposal emerges. In this approach, Neopyrrhonism is an open-ended inquiry that implies the ability of using different philosophical argumentative strategies in a performative sense to encourage a new way of exercising philosophy.

Palabras clave : Neopyrrhonism; Metaphilosophy; Quietism; Philosophical Arguments; Disagreements.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )