SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número54Religion and Science Without Belief? índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Praxis Filosófica

versão impressa ISSN 0120-4688versão On-line ISSN 2389-9387

Resumo

REINOSO, Guadalupe. Neopyrrhonism as Metaphilosophy: A Non-Quietist Proposal. Prax. filos. [online]. 2022, n.54, pp.11-30.  Epub 09-Mar-2022. ISSN 0120-4688.  https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i54.11935.

R. Fogelin (2002 [1976]; 1992 [1981]; 1994) was the first one to speak about “Neopyrrhonism” to link Wittgenstein and Sextus Empiricus. To him, Pyrrhonism “combines philosophical scepticism with scepticism about philosophy, that is, to have doubts about philosophy on the basis of philosophical arguments” (1994, p. 3). Following this interpretation, Neopyrrhonism can be understood as a kind of scepticism that cancels philosophy using self-destructive arguments (peritrope). Both Sextus -with his proposal of suspension of judgment- and Wittgenstein -with his idea of the dissolution of philosophical problems- are representatives of quietism. Neopyrrhonism as quietism can be conceived of as a therapeutic proposal mainly based on not postulating an argumentative-constructive philosophical theory. Against this perspective, I propose interpreting Neopyrrhonism as Metaphilosophy, from which a performative proposal emerges. In this approach, Neopyrrhonism is an open-ended inquiry that implies the ability of using different philosophical argumentative strategies in a performative sense to encourage a new way of exercising philosophy.

Palavras-chave : Neopyrrhonism; Metaphilosophy; Quietism; Philosophical Arguments; Disagreements.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )