SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue5Ranolazine in chronic ischaemic heart disease: a protective factor against de novo atrial fibrillationLeft distal radius approach through the anatomical snuff box to perform coronary angiography author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Colombiana de Cardiología

Print version ISSN 0120-5633

Abstract

CASTRO-URDA, Víctor et al. Incidence, success rate, complications and predictive factors of the use of the femoral route for the removal of the electrodes after percutaneous procedures. Rev. Colomb. Cardiol. [online]. 2020, vol.27, n.5, pp.405-413.  Epub July 24, 2021. ISSN 0120-5633.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rccar.2018.12.008.

Introduction:

The femoral route is used in electrode removal procedures when the upper route has failed.

Objective:

To describe the incidence, success rate, complications and predictive factors for the use of the femoral route.

Methods:

An analysis was performed on the incidence of use of the femoral route and the predictive factors in patients in whom electrode removal was carried out between November 2011 and November 2017.

Results:

The study included 85 patients with a mean age of 62.36 ± 11.5 years. Pacemakers made up 38.9% of the devices. A total of 135 electrodes, 59.3% of passive fixation, were removed. The median time since the implant was 102 (60-174) months. The femoral route was used in 25.9% of the procedures. Clinical success was achieved in 92.9% of the patients. The removal was not successful in 22.7% of the procedures when the femoral route was used, compared to 1.6% when the upper route was used (P = .004). The removal was not completed in 36.4% of the procedures when the femoral route was used, compared to 9.5% with the upper route (P = .007).

The factors that predicted the use of the femoral route were the presence of passive-fixation electrodes (OR = 13.69: 95% CI; 3.06 - 62.5, P = .001), and the time since the electrodes were implanted (OR = 1.04, 95% CI; 1.00 - 1.09, P = .044, for every 10 months).

Conclusions:

The femoral route was employed in 25.9% of the procedures. It was not effective in 22.7% of the interventions. The factors that predicted its use were the presence of passive-fixation electrodes and the time since the electrode implant.

Keywords : Removal; Electrodes; Femoral vein.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )