Introduction:

Two-dimensional echocardiography is the most effective technique for diagnosing pericardial effusion due to its high sensitivity and specificity.

Objective:

The superiority of the method of disks was compared with the bidimensional method in the estimation of pericardial effusion by echocardiography, taking as reference the volume of pericardial fluid removed by pericardiocentesis or open surgery.

Method:

Retrospective follow-up study of a cohort, based on medical records and echocardiography files. A paired design was used, each image was read by the bidimensional method and by the method of disks. Severe pericardial effusions defined clinically or by echocardiographic parameters, that required drainage were included. The performance of the bidimensional and disks estimation methods, taking the volume removed as a reference, was quantified using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auROC).

Results:

40 records were analyzed, taking as a reference the volume obtained by extraction, with an auROC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89) the diagnostic performance of the disks method was significantly higher (p = 0.0335) than the bidimensional method (auROC 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.83). The estimate made by the disks method underestimated an average of 51.3 ml (95% CI: -156.2-53.5).

Conclusions:

In patients with pericardial effusion with indication of cardiac drainage or tamponade, the disks method is superior in comparison with the bidimensional method in the echocardiographic study of the quantitative estimation of pericardial effusion, discriminating better than the bidimensional method.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )