SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 issue1Atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing renal replacement therapyThe association between risk scores and clinical outcome in acute coronary syndrome patients author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Colombiana de Cardiología

Print version ISSN 0120-5633

Abstract

FIGUEROA-CASANOVA, Rafael et al. Experience in aortic valve replacement using different surgical accesses between 2018 and 2021: a cross-sectional study. Rev. Colomb. Cardiol. [online]. 2025, vol.32, n.1, pp.25-31.  Epub Mar 05, 2025. ISSN 0120-5633.  https://doi.org/10.24875/rccar.23000104.

Introduction:

Aortic valve replacement is currently one of the most common cardiac surgeries, traditionally performed through open-heart surgery (median sternotomy). However, alternative surgical approaches, such as minimally invasive surgery through a mini-median sternotomy and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI), have been developed.

Objective:

To describe the experience of a cardiovascular center in Tolima regarding aortic valve replacement through different surgical approaches between 2018 and 2021.

Method:

A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. A descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed regarding the surgical approach used.

Results:

The population consisted of 131 patients. Degenerative aortic valve disease was observed in 71.7% (n = 94) of cases, followed by congenital cases at 28.2% (n = 37). Regarding the surgical approach, 64.9% (n = 85) underwent open-heart surgery, followed by 24.4% (n = 32) through a minimally invasive approach, and in third place, 10.7% (n = 14) underwent transcatheter replacement. Bivariate analysis revealed that the minimally invasive approach showed better results.

Conclusions:

The open surgical approach is the most commonly implemented; however, the minimally invasive approach should be considered as an option due to its excellent results and a similar economic cost. This approach offers benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and a smaller surgical scar. Transcatheter access is preferred for patients at high surgical risk.

Keywords : Aortic valve; Aortic valve stenosis; Aortic valve insufficiency; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )