SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número61Separación de flujo base en la cuenca superior del río LebrijaDesarrollo de un sistema de fotoirradiación para terapia fotodinámica con control dosimétrico índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia

versión impresa ISSN 0120-6230versión On-line ISSN 2422-2844

Resumen

RINCON, Nancy; GALINDO, Andres  y  PEREZ, Jhonny. Evaluation of the Hydraulic Behaviour in a Double-Chamber Anaerobic Reactor (DCAR). Rev.fac.ing.univ. Antioquia [online]. 2011, n.61, pp.53-63. ISSN 0120-6230.

In the organic load removal in a wastewater treatment system, biochemical processes and hydrodynamic aspects take place as characteristics of the flow, mix regime, residence times and reactor geometry, otherwise, the conditions for non-ideal flow as by-passing, dead zones and internal recirculation affect their performance. This study deals with an evaluation ofthe hydraulic behavior of a double-chamber anaerobic reactor (DCAR) of 534.5L (chamber 1=305L and chamber 2=229.5L) as a technological innovation of the UASB reactors. The DCAR was fed with Maracaibo, Venezuela municipal wastewater; each chamber was inoculated with a granular, local brewery sludge (20% v/v). The hydraulic evaluation was performed at the liquid phase and in operation, using Li+ (LiCl) as a tracer applied in an instantaneous way at the affluent at the theoretical hydraulic retention time (TRHt) of 6 hours; 3.4 in the chamber number 1 and 2.6 in chamber number 2. The DCAR described as a plug flow in both chambers and a hydraulic efficiency close to the unit (1), indicating an almost null presence of dead zones. The CDO (CDOT) of DCAR removal efficiency was kept in the range of 59.77% to 74.46% with an average of 68.26%. For chambers 1 and 2 the average efficiency was 60.4 and 20.94 with a biogas production (L/h) of 2.768 and 0.541 respectively.

Palabras clave : double-chamber reactor; dispersion coefficient; hydraulic efficiency; dead zones.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons