SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número2MEANS OF INTERPRETATION, LEGAL HERMENEUTICS AND NATURAL LAWDETERMINATIO IN THE PROCESS OF ADJUDICATION: A PRUDENTIAL VIEW OF LEGAL REASONING índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Díkaion

versão impressa ISSN 0120-8942

Resumo

HERRERA, DANIEL ALEJANDRO. FALLACIES AND TRUTHS IN THE CURRENT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS JUSTIFICATION. Díkaion [online]. 2010, vol.19, n.2, pp.349-372. ISSN 0120-8942.

In this article it pretends to show the fallacies and truths of the different actual justifications of the Essentials Rights. Precisely, being the problem of the rational justification, will focus the question on the problem of the reason and the extent of their knowledge. To better manage the exposure of the different foundations, they will be classified in three lines: 1) positivistic reason; 2) proceduralist reason; 3) practical reason.

Palavras-chave : Human rights; essentials rights; fallacy; true; positivistic reason; proceduralist reason; practical reason; metaphysics; anthropology.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )