SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue2LAICISM AND LIBERALISM AS PARADIGMS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS: REFLECTIONS ON THE CONFIGURATION OF THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN THE CONTEXT OF FRENCH DEBATE ABOUT THE ISLAMIC VEIL author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Díkaion

Print version ISSN 0120-8942

Abstract

OLIVEIRA DE SOUSA, FELIPE. THE OBJECTIVITY OF BELIEFS, REASONABLE DISAGREEMENT AND POLITICAL DELIBERATION. Díkaion [online]. 2011, vol.20, n.2, pp.213-236. ISSN 0120-8942.

This paper is part of a broader argument that seeks to offer a justification for political (and law's) authority. The aims here are two-fold: to investigate the role of truth in political argument and to place the problem of reasonable disagreement. More precisely, the argument focuses on the possibility of political deliberation. Political deliberation figures as a preliminary stage of political decision-making. It has to do with a confrontation between various incompatible substantive beliefs which, in despite of this, seem to be all reasonable. How can citizens holding incompatible beliefs engage in a common enterprise of justifying them to one another? That is the main question.

Keywords : Beliefs; objectivity; truth; reasonable disagreement; political deliberation.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )