SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue2THE RULE OF LAW AND THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTSCRIMINAL CONSTITUTIONS AND THEORY OF PUNISHMENT: NOTES ON A NECESSARY RELATIONSHIP AND PROPOSAL FOR POSSIBLE CONTENT ON SPECIAL PREVENTION author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Díkaion

Print version ISSN 0120-8942

Abstract

DIDIER, MARÍA MARTA. THE RIGHT TO CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION: CRITERIA FOR INTERPRETATION. Díkaion [online]. 2015, vol.24, n.2, pp.253-281. ISSN 0120-8942.  https://doi.org/10.5294/DIKA.2015.24.2.3.

The study argues that the principle of reasonableness is possibly one way to determine when conscientious objection constitutes the regular exercise of a right based on legal philosophy, the theory of fundamental rights and jurisprudential practice. A constitutionality test applicable to the regulations on the right to conscientious objection in the Argentine legal system is proposed by way of conclusion.

Keywords : Conscientious objection; freedom of religion and conscience; reasonableness; proportionality; equality; discrimination; practical reasonableness.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )