SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue1JUDICIAL REVIEW AND POLITICAL LEGITIMACYJANO'S DILEMMA. A COMMENTARY ON RULING 1221/2014 OF THE PEOPLE`S SUPREME COURT OF CUBA author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Díkaion

Print version ISSN 0120-8942

Abstract

PEREZ-DUHARTE, Arlín. DETERMINING THE PERPETRATORS OF WHITE COLLAR CRIMES. IDEAS ON SOLUTIONS AND SEVERAL POINTS FOR DEBAT. Díkaion [online]. 2018, vol.27, n.1, pp.29-50. ISSN 0120-8942.  https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2018.27.1.2.

White collar crimes pose a major problem for criminal law, for their classification in the catalogues of sanctions, for the application of traditional formulas used to determine the perpetrators, for the sanctions to be employed, and how they relate to the so-called socializing paradigm. These are some of the questions students of the science of law try to find answers for every day. Consequently, when debating how to associate the results these crimes have for their perpetrators various ideas have emerged with respect to solutions that are grounded in omission, specifically in the perpetration or commission of a crime by omission, in the authorship of a crime and, finally, in notions of participation. An analysis of each of these solutions is the objective of this work.

Keywords : Economic and managerial crimes; omission; commission for omission; responsibility and participation.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )