SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 issue2Judicial Formalism, Activism, and DiscretionThe Discourse on Religion in the Colombian Constitutional Case-law: A Transformative Narrative? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Díkaion

Print version ISSN 0120-8942On-line version ISSN 2027-5366

Abstract

SOLANO, Lucía  and  QUINTANA, Juan José. Palestine vs. the United States before the International Court of Justice. Díkaion [online]. 2020, vol.29, n.2, pp.352-378.  Epub Apr 12, 2021. ISSN 0120-8942.  https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2020.29.2.2.

This article discusses Palestine’s lawsuit against the United States before the International Court of Justice for its alleged violations of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The lawsuit was brought after the US president’s announcement to move the embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The case has critical diplomatic repercussions but raises various legal questions related to Palestine’s access to the Court with or without its capacity as a State, the Court’s jurisdiction, the enforceability of Palestine’s adherence to the Convention and its Optional Protocol, and the admissibility of the lawsuit. The paper discusses whether Palestine could initiate a case before the Court, whether the secretariat of the Court should have accepted the case, and whether the Court has jurisdiction to rule on it. This analysis is based on the provisions in the Court’s bylaws, regulations, and extensive case law regarding procedural matters.

Keywords : International Court of Justice; contentious matters; access; competence; admissibility; State; enforceability; preliminary objections.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )