SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 issue2Proposals for the Adequate Incorporation of the Right to Try: The United States-Colombia CasePretrial Detention from the Review for Compliance. The Binomial of Proportionality and Proper Grounds for Prosecutor General’s Decisions as a Rule in Peruvian Criminal Prosecution author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Díkaion

Print version ISSN 0120-8942On-line version ISSN 2027-5366

Abstract

BENCOMO FARINAS, Yaneisi. Solve et repete in the Tax Environment. Critical Notes on the Theses Justifying Its Demand. Díkaion [online]. 2020, vol.29, n.2, pp.441-468.  Epub Apr 12, 2021. ISSN 0120-8942.  https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2020.29.2.5.

This paper presents arguments against the maintenance of one of the most recognized procedural rules in tax law: solve et repete or prepayment. So, the objective is to make a critical assessment of the different theses defended by the doctrine to justify this economic requirement in the tax landscape, reflecting on its inadequacies. In parallel, it emphasizes the need for each State to guarantee, when instituting the powers and prerogatives of the Tax Administration, that they do not violate the unrestricted respect for, assurance, and defense of the taxpayers’ rights, in as much the rights are established within the constitutional limits and purposes of state power and the jurisdictions of rulers and government agencies.

Keywords : Prepayment; solve et repete; legal nature; thesis; tax administration; taxpayers; rights.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )