SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 número2 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Díkaion

versão impressa ISSN 0120-8942versão On-line ISSN 2027-5366

Resumo

COLON-RIOS, Joel I.. The State of Comparative Constitutional Law: What are Constitutions For?. Díkaion [online]. 2022, vol.31, n.2, e31213.  Epub 29-Set-2022. ISSN 0120-8942.  https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2022.31.2.13.

This article seeks to show that a significant part of the contemporary literature generally classified as comparative constitutional law, works under a conception of the nature of constitutions which at odds with democracy or, more specifically, with what I will call democratic constitutional theory. This argument is defended by examining some of the works of key comparative constitutional law scholars of this discipline such as Rosalind Dixon, David Landau, Tom Ginsburg, Aziz Huq, and Richard Albert. The goal is to identify the ways in which they reproduce, explicitly or implicitly, a particular view of what constitutions ought to do. This point of view, which can be identified as 'liberal', is characterized by understanding constitutions as mechanisms to constrain political power. As a result, they reflect some problems that what I will call the problem of blind-spots the minimization of democracy, the sterilization of political conflict, and the absence of materiality. I will argue that constraining the exercise of political power is not the only purpose attributable to a constitution: from the perspective of a democratic constitutional theory, a constitution should be understood as a mechanism aimed at facilitating popular self-government. This article is composed of three sections. First, it explains what I mean by 'constitutional theory' and contrasts dominant forms of liberal theorization with more democratic ones. Second, it contends that, by operating under the liberal approach, comparative constitutional law frequently suffers from the four problems listed above. Third, it concludes with a brief reflection on the potential democratization of the discipline.

Palavras-chave : Comparative constitutional law; constitutional theory; democracy; self-government.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )