SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 número2Factores asociados a dentición funcional en adultos mayores de la subred centro oriente, Bogotá, 2017El potencial terapéutico del secretoma de las células troncales índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


CES Odontología

versión impresa ISSN 0120-971X

Resumen

GUTIERREZ-PINEDA, José Luis; ROBAYO-FALLA, Juan Camilo; FERNANDEZ-GRISALES, Rafael  y  MUNOZ-ZAPATA, Sebastián. Use of absolute isolation with rubber dam in restorative treatments by oral rehabilitators in the department of Antioquia. CES odontol. [online]. 2018, vol.31, n.2, pp.28-37. ISSN 0120-971X.  https://doi.org/10.21615/cesodon.31.2.3.

Introduction and Objective:

The absolute isolation of the operative field with rubber dam (DG), is essential for the successful outcome of the endodontic and restorative treatment. To date, there is no scientific evidence to support its use among oral rehabilitators. The purposes of this study were: to determine the frequency of the use of DG as a method of absolute isolation, to identify which socio-demographic variables influenced its use, and to know the main reasons for its use or not by oral rehabilitators of the department of Antioquia during the restorative procedures.

Materials and methods:

A self-diligent survey with 17 questions was done to 77 oral rehabilitators. A descriptive uni-variate and bivariate statistical analysis using Pearson’s chi-square test was used to determine the association between demographic factors and the use or not of the DG (P <0.05).

Results:

In general, the prevalence of the use of the DG was 89.6% confidence interval, 95% (82.8% - 96.4%), being higher in the posterior sector 61.1%, followed by 55.9% in the previous sector, 19.5% post cementation and 14, 3% in the development of posts. Meanwhile, the lack of time with 44.2% and not seeing the need 28.6%, were the most prevalent reasons for omitting the use of the DG; the humidity control with 81.8% and improve the adhesion 71.4%, justified its use. Clinical experience was the only variable that influenced the use of DG (P = 0.03).

Conclusion:

The use of DG was more frequent for the posterior sector than the previous one, and frequently omitted for the elaboration and cementation of posts.

Palabras clave : Isolation; Rubber dam; Survey; Oral rehabilitation.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )