SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 issue2Distribution pattern of enamel fluorosis severity: What is it telling us about local fluoride exposure?Assessment of hearing capacity in students of a faculty of dentistry in Colombia author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


CES Odontología

Print version ISSN 0120-971X

Abstract

ALVES, Lísia Daltro Borges et al. Oral toxicities of oncology therapy in children and adolescents: a descriptive study. CES odontol. [online]. 2021, vol.34, n.2, pp.30-45.  Epub Mar 28, 2022. ISSN 0120-971X.  https://doi.org/10.21615/cesodon.5887.

Introduction and objective:

Cancer is the second leading cause of death among children and adolescents in Brazil. To evaluate the prevalence of oral toxicities resulting from cancer treatment in children and adolescents treated at the Hospital Estadual da Criança, from 2016 to 2017.

Material and methods:

This is a descriptive study with data obtained from medical records. Variables related to neoplasia, carrier, oral toxicities and cancer treatment were studied, which were analyzed descriptively and thFisher χ2 test was performed for some of them.

Results:

Fifty eigth patients were identified, mostly female (53%) and aged between 3 and 5 years (28%), with an average of 6.62 years. The most frequent neoplasm was acute lymphoid leukemia (38%), with chemotherapy alone being the most used therapeutic modality (67%), especially with the use of cytarabine (60%) and vincristine (56%). Twenty-three (40%) of the children and adolescents exhibited some oral toxicity during cancer therapy, and for this reason, 4 (17.4%) had their antineoplastic treatment interrupted. Oral mucositis (70%) was the most common toxicity, affecting the lips in 55% and being associated with pain in 64% of cases. Eighteen (78.2%) patients received treatment for oral toxicities, with nystatin being prescribed in 88.9% of cases. In addition, there was a significant association between survival status and place of residence (p=0.03).

Conclusions:

Among the 58 children and adolescents studied, 40% had oral toxicities and 4 had their antineoplastic treatment interrupted for this reason. Thus, the importance and the need for the performance of the dentist in the multidisciplinary team in oncology is reinforced.

Keywords : oral manifestations; antineoplastic protocols; stomatitis; patient care team.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )