SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue39MATERIAL CONFLICT OF INDIGENOUS OWNERSHIP RIGHTSTHE PROCESSES OF SINGLE INSTANCE IN THE GENERAL CODE OF THE PROCESS: THE CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEE OF THE DUE PROCESS AND THE DOUBLE INSTANCE author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Prolegómenos

Print version ISSN 0121-182X

Abstract

MOCOROA, Juan M.. THE RATIONALITY OF THE WEIGHTING IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT. Prolegómenos [online]. 2017, vol.20, n.39, pp.73-85. ISSN 0121-182X.  https://doi.org/10.18359/prole.2724.

This article defends a way to bypass the objection that the weighting is irrational. To do this, it is argued that it should be understood as a simple "formal structure" for the analysis of judicial decisions rendered in cases of disputes over rights. However, it does not imply that in this field there do not exist possibilities to the discretion and the subjective judgements.

Keywords : Weighting; conflict of rights; argumentative rationality; judicial discretion.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License