SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue40The causality of the unmoved mover according to Pseudo AlexanderSoul, impulse, and movement according to Alexander of Aphrodisias author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Estudios de Filosofía

Print version ISSN 0121-3628

Abstract

SALLES, Ricardo. Alexander of Aphrodisias and the problem of instrumentality' of logic. Notes on in A. Pr. 2, 22-33. Estud.filos [online]. 2009, n.40, pp.223-243. ISSN 0121-3628.

Ricardo Salles' contribution is focused on Alexander's Peripatetic interpretation against the Stoic thesis that logic is not an "instrument", but a "part" of philosophy. According to Alexander, if logic were part of philosophy, as the Stoics maintain, philosophy could not occupy the highest place in the hierarchy of knowledge. Salles takes this to be paradoxical since both the Stoics and the Peripatetics consider that philosophy is, due to its object, the highest discipline. According to Salles, Alexander's acute criticism is not penetrating enough to make obvious a real inconsistency in Stoicism. In his view, Alexander's main weakness is that the reasoning on which such criticism is based depends upon some Aristotelian assumptions that the Stoics reject.

Keywords : Alexander; Stoicism; philosophy.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License