SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número65Can there be an input from philosophical debates on a better use of nature? Towards an improvement of nature rights in environmental economics índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Estudios de Filosofía

versão impressa ISSN 0121-3628

Resumo

TORRES ALDAVE, Mikel. Who owns nature? Sentience, environmental ethics and intervention in nature. Estud.filos [online]. 2022, n.65, pp.7-29.  Epub 22-Mar-2022. ISSN 0121-3628.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.345879.

Who owns nature? The question could be less important than reducing ani- mal sufferings in nature. It does not matter if nature does not belong to anyone (or if it belongs to everybody) or if it belongs to someone, because in both cases there are limitations, linked with animal welfare, regarding what we should do in nature. Sentient beings have interests that we must take into account when designing environmental policies. Since neither ecosystems nor plants have interests, preserving nature is less important than reducing animal sufferings. The relevant moral issue is, therefore, knowing what happens to sentient animals in nature and developing policies to reduce their suf- ferings. This implies that we have the moral obligation of intervening in nature with the aim of reducing animal sufferings, so conservationist environmental policies defended by ecologists are morally unacceptable.

Palavras-chave : animal ethics; ecologism; welfare biology; interests; animal welfare; intervention in nature.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )