SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número65Can there be an input from philosophical debates on a better use of nature? Towards an improvement of nature rights in environmental economicsDeleuze’s reading of the Critique of Pure Reason índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Estudios de Filosofía

versão impressa ISSN 0121-3628

Resumo

WESCHE, Tilo. Who owns nature? About the rights of nature. Estud.filos [online]. 2022, n.65, pp.49-68.  Epub 23-Mar-2022. ISSN 0121-3628.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.347573.

Property rights are often seen as a gateway to the destruction of nature. In view of the ecological crisis, criticism of property rights is therefore becoming louder and louder. On the one hand, rightly so, since global warming, resource depletion, global pollution and the loss of species have been made possible by the private ownership of natural assets. On the other hand, the criticism falls short. Even common and public property does not protect natural assets from being overexploited, resources depleted, and values extracted. Moreover, it is questionable whether nature would actually be better off today without any property regulation. A new understanding of property that does justice to natural goods is therefore needed. The article considers the rights of nature as a way to rethink property in this sense and explores reasons to give rights of nature a general validity.

Palavras-chave : nature; rights of nature; philosophy; ecological crisis.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )