SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue38Conceptual distinctions to determine international jurisdiction for environmental damage. Comparative law study based on article 5.3 Regulation (EC) Brussels ILegal analysis on the application of enviromental sanctionatory process for the protection of the fauna in three municipalities of the province of Chocó, 2005-2010 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de Derecho

Print version ISSN 0121-8697

Abstract

PRONO, Santiago. Rule of law and democracy. About the justification of constitutional judicial review in Habermas's theory of discourse. Rev. Derecho [online]. 2012, n.38, pp.36-59. ISSN 0121-8697.

One of the restrictions of Law over the other branches of government (legislative and executive) is the judicial control of constitutionality of democratic norms. This raises questions because it is objected that judges do not have the democratic legitimacy for such decisions. This article analyzes the theoretical position of Habermas to justify the articulation between the point of view of law and democracy, that the judicial review implies, on the basis of his theory of discourse. The idea is that it can provide a greater theoretical support than is usually proposed to justify this kind of normative control.

Keywords : Law; democracy; theory of discourse; constitutional control; standard justification; Habermas.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )