Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Share
Revista de Derecho
Print version ISSN 0121-8697On-line version ISSN 2145-9355
Abstract
BLANCO CORTINA, DAVID. Proportionality and transitional sanctions Analysis of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace's (JEP) punishment model. Rev. Derecho [online]. 2019, n.52, pp.164-192. ISSN 0121-8697.
This article examines the proportionality of JEP's own sanctions, in order to demonstrate these sanctions do not break the duty of investigate, judge and punish of responsible by serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. In first place, I analyze the limits and scope of that duty, with special reference of Rome's Statute. In second place, I study the objectives of punishment in transitional justice. By last, I review the proportionality of own sanctions for to set up that there is a compensatory balance between low interference of retributive dimension of justice, high protection of peace right and medium safeguard of victims' rights.
Keywords : Transitional justice; own sanctions; proportionality and objectives of punishment.