SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número2ENERGY, EXERGY, AND EMISSION ANALYSIS OF MODIFIED COMPRESSION IGNITION ENGINE WORKING ON TRIPLE FUEL MODE índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro

versão impressa ISSN 0122-5383versão On-line ISSN 2382-4581

Resumo

ARYANFAR, Yashar et al. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF A TRANS-CRITICAL CARBON DIOXIDE CYCLE POWERED BY A SINGLE FLASH GEOTHERMAL CYCLE WITH/WITHOUT ECONOMIZER OPERATING MODES. C.T.F Cienc. Tecnol. Futuro [online]. 2023, vol.13, n.2, pp.5-13.  Epub 01-Dez-2024. ISSN 0122-5383.  https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.661.

Renewable energy, particularly geothermal energy, is on the rise globally. It has been demonstrated that recovering heat lost during geothermal cycles is essential due to the inefficiency of these cycles. This paper pproposes a combined power generation cycle using EES software to model a single-flash geothermal cycle, and a trans-critical carbon dioxide cycle. The study compares the system's performance during its "Without Economizer" and "With Economizer" operational stages. The impact of the economizer on the system's output metrics, including the net power output, energy efficiency, and energy efficiency, was examined. The results show that the "With Economizer" system's net power output increased from 451.3 kW to 454 kW. The energy efficiency difference between the two systems is based on the first law of thermodynamics, where the value ofthe "Without Economizer" system is 6.036%, and the "With Economizer" system is 6.075%. The system without an economizer had an energy efficiency value of 26.26%, whereas the system with an economizer reached 26.43%, based on the second law of thermodynamics. Installing the economizer increased the total economic cost rate of the system from 0.225M$/Year to 0.2294M$/Year, which increased the product cost rate from 15.82$/GJ to 16.02$/GJ.

Palavras-chave : Economizer; Production cost rate; single-flash geothermal cycle; total cost rate; trans-critical CO2 cycle.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )