SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue43What is social justice? A new history of its meaning in the transnational legal discourseThe nature of the internal conventionality control and its dissimilar reception in the jurisprudence of the Chilean courts author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Derecho del Estado

Print version ISSN 0122-9893

Abstract

CHAVEZ-FERNANDEZ-POSTIGO, José. Balancing and equity: Alexy, Recaséns and the pursuit of reasonableness in legal argumentation. Rev. Derecho Estado [online]. 2019, n.43, pp.107-130. ISSN 0122-9893.  https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n43.05.

This work takes as a starting point that Luis Recaséns Siches' "logic of the reasonable" theory is a predecessor of contemporary theories of legal argumentation such as Robert Alexy's one. Nevertheless, this work does not address this general thesis; its approach is more specific: to compare "balancing" and "equity" as the key concepts of what both authors understand as "reasonableness". This paper aims to throw light on what meaning should be given to "reasonable" within legal argumentation. In this regard, this paper evidences that Recasens' understanding of "reasonable" is comparable to Alexy's model only on the surface and that Recasens' model possesses two distinctive significant contributions which may be useful to show the way towards a lighter meaning of "reasonable" within legal argumentation.

Keywords : Alexy; Recaséns; Balancing; Equity; Reasonableness; Legal Argumentation.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )