SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue1”FOCUS ON PRACTICE”: CLINICAL ETHICS CONSULTATION ON AN ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANT CASEWHY CLINICAL ETHICS? EXPERIENCE, DISCERNMENT AND THE ANAMNESIS OF MEANING AT THE BEDSIDE author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Persona y Bioética

Print version ISSN 2027-5382
On-line version ISSN 0123-3122

Abstract

BARONE, Mauro; COGLIANDRO, Annalisa; PERSICHETTI, Paolo  and  DI STEFANO, Nicola. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON CASE REPORTS AND ANALYSIS OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH COSMETIC RHINOPLASTY. pers.bioét. [online]. 2016, vol.20, n.1, pp.77-85. ISSN 2027-5382.  http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/PEBI.2016.20.1.8.

The paper discusses an ethical analysis of three common cases involving the most popular requests in rhinoplasty. As the nose plays a fundamental role in the aesthetics and physiognomy of the human face, the request for rhinoplasty may be an expression of both subjective discomfort and objective dysfunction. The paper aims, therefore, to fill the gap between qualitative-subjective impressions related to bodily self-perception and its quantitative-objective assessment. Ethical evaluation should start with consideration of the formal object and circumstances of the act, by posing the following question: Is this a real clinical case? Only after an undoubtedly positive answer to this question, should we consider specific case-related aspects; i.e., the best scientific evidence, available nosography and informed consent, before conducting an ethical evaluation of the case.

Keywords : Rhinoplasty; ethical evaluation; quality of life; pre- and post-operative questionnaire.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )