Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
Revista de Derecho Privado
versión impresa ISSN 0123-4366
Resumen
ROSSO ELORRIAGA, Gian Franco. The principle of limited strict liability: An element of systemic balance that does not contradict the so-called principle of full reparation of damage. Rev. Derecho Privado [online]. 2014, n.26, pp.449-497. ISSN 0123-4366.
The modern tendency to objectify civil liability has generated different systemic contradictions that require the application of elements of balance between subjective liability and strict liability. To face the permanent abuse of the principle of legality, this paper proposes a way to balance liability using the principle that there cannot be strict liability without quantitative limitation of compensation. Yet, this principle would be apparently in contradiction with the so called principle of full reparation of damage. The paper considers the possible contradiction from the point of view of the moral basis of both kinds of liability as well as the principle of full reparation of the damage. In addition, it deepens the problem from its essential element, as it is the 'loss'. This paper studies also the principle of full reparation of damage from a non traditional point of view. Finally, the author condenses the conclusions reached, which are consistent with the absence of contradiction between the principle that there is no strict liability without quantitative limitation and the principle of full reparation of damage.
Palabras clave : strict liability; limitation on damages; principle of full reparation of damages (restitutio in integrum); corrective justice; distributive justice; loss.