SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número38Tomem o bom, deixem o mau: Simón Rodríguez e a educação popularComemorações do quarto e quinto centenário do "12 de outubro de 1492": debates sobre a identidade americana índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista de Estudios Sociales

versão impressa ISSN 0123-885X

Resumo

GUTIERREZ ARDILA, Daniel. Iturbide and Bolívar: Two Diplomatic Portraits Regarding the Republican Question (1822-1831). rev.estud.soc. [online]. 2011, n.38, pp.47-63. ISSN 0123-885X.

According to Lamartine, in his History of the Girodins, the monarchical form of government, essentially cautious, was most appropriate for periods of calm and for maintaining the status quo. The republican form of government, by contrast, was ideal for dealing with the crises, the organic transformations, and revolutions that were underway. Following this suggestive comment, it is worth asking whether, just as the French Constitutional Assembly tried in vain to reconcile both extremes by entrusting the legacy of the Revolution to a semi-dethroned king, the founders of the Hispanic American republics did not use the figure of the Liberators in the same manner. To answer this question, this article explores the portraits from the 1820s of Agustín de Iturbide and Simón Bolívar by diplomats Miguel de Santamaría and José Anastasio Torrens.

Palavras-chave : Agustín de Iturbide; Simón Bolívar; Diplomatic History; Revolutions of Independence.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons